March
Sunday, March 28th, 2010I held a philosophical café today in Stjärnsund, the second one this month. Rather small groups, good discussions. What I do is I let people propose questions, we discuss them for a while, then vote for one question to investigate more thoroughly. Last time the winner was “What is a good life”, today “What is liberty?” and “What is responsibility?” (the group thought these two were close enough to be combined).
The main philosophy event this month was a Workshop on Climate Change in Uppsala, where I presented some new ideas on the value of population size in the future. Many of us have a strong intuition that the world is neither better nor worse for having more people around, disregarding their effects on others and on nature. However, this intuition seems inconsistent with the strong intuition that it is better to get an addition of happy people than to get an addition of less happy people. If status quo is equally good as addition A and equally good as addition B, it would seem addition A and addition B must be equally good. I get around this problem by making the value of the existence of future people relative to the context they exist in. It might be a good idea, I will give it some more time.
